US Intelligence Says It Knew ISIS-K Was Planning Terror Attack on Moscow That Killed 40+ People
The initial reports that ISIS has claimed responsibility for the terror attack in Moscow appeared rumor at first, and has still been subject of widespread scrutiny and debate, however, US media and government officials are saying that the Islamic State (or ISIS-K) statement is authentic. “A branch of the Islamic State claimed responsibility on Friday for the attack in Moscow that killed at least 40 people and injured about 100 others, and U.S. officials confirmed the claim shortly afterward,” The New York Times writes late in the day.
What’s more is that US intelligence knew there was to be an imminent attack on Moscow: “The United States collected intelligence in March that Islamic State-Khorasan, known as ISIS-K, the branch of the group based in Afghanistan, had been planning an attack on Moscow, according to officials. ISIS members have been active in Russia, one U.S. official said.”
The Kremlin had earlier in the day demanded answers of Washington explaining why the US Embassy in Moscow issued an alert earlier this month for all US nationals to avoid public venues and be extra vigilant. We previously reported on that early March embassy notification here. NY Times continues, citing US officials: “After a period of relative quiet, the Islamic State has been trying to increase its external attacks, according to U.S. counterterrorism officials. Most of those plots in Europe have been thwarted, prompting assessments that the group had diminished capabilities.”
Importantly, Russian state media and sources have been slow to report the ISIS-K claims, nor have state officials identified any culprits or group at this late hour. Russian media in general has not reflected Western press reports concerning the claims that ISIS-K was behind it, likely pending a deeper and ongoing investigation. It is possible that some of the gunmen may still be at large.
Speculation continues to run rampant, and there’s as yet been little that’s confirmed from Russian security services and authorities.
If ISIS is indeed behind the Moscow attack, here's a likely reason why: Russia helped prevent an ISIS takeover of Syria during the CIA-led dirty war there.
— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) March 22, 2024
John Kerry admitted this, while also disclosing that the US "watched" ISIS grow in Syria in the hopes it could help… https://t.co/01cMNwZYHw
At least 40 were killed when a group of heavily armed, unidentified gunmen stormed Crocus City Hall music venue. Russia’s Health Ministry has released a list of names of 145 people who have been hospitalized in critical condition. Children are among them.
Below: video has emerged showing the moments the gunmen entered the concert hall, after randomly massacring people in the attached mall area of the complex…
MASSACRE IN RUSSIA – THE MOMENT THE SHOOTING STARTED INSIDE THE CONCERT HALL. DOZENS REPORTED DEAD.pic.twitter.com/ib9e4MTIht
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) March 22, 2024
The Islamic State (ISIS) has claimed responsibility for the Moscow terrorist attack according to a report by the Amaq news agency (and otherwise unconfirmed).
🚨🇷🇺BREAKING: ISIS CLAIMS MOSCOW ATTACK
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) March 22, 2024
Reportedly, the terrorist group ISIS has claimed responsibility for the attack on the Crocus Concert Hall in Moscow that left at least 40 people dead and dozens injured.
Source: @BNONews https://t.co/M8yVhEZ5Io pic.twitter.com/3FNhIkjjko
Moscow has come out with fighting words while also pointing the finger at Washington about ‘what it knew’ ahead of time and when:
Medvedev threatens Ukraine’s top officials will be ‘destroyed mercilessly as terrorists’ if the ‘Kyiv regime’ is linked to Moscow concert hall attack.
The former president Deputy Chairman of the Security Council is known to routinely issue threatening and hawkish words, but the Russian foreign ministry has issued the following as cited in Reuters:
“On what basis do officials in Washington draw any conclusions in the midst of a tragedy about someone’s innocence?” She added that if Washington had information, it should be shared and that if Washington had no information, it should not be talking in such a way.
