World

WHO Cleaned Up Ebola Rape Scandal With $250 Payoff For Congolese Victims: Documents

When the World Health Organisation went to the Congo between 2018 and 2020, nearly two-dozen workers for the UN agency preyed on more than 100 Congolese women, with dozens of staffers raping, sexually abusing, and otherwise harassing local women.

One of the victims, identified in a UN report as “Jolianne,” was believed to be 13 years old. Other women say their attackers used no birth control, from which several pregnancies ensued. Some of the women were forced by their rapists to get abortions.

In the case of “Jolianne,” a WHO driver stopped on a roadside in the town of Mangina, where she was selling phone cards in April of 2019 and offered to give her a ride home.

“Instead, he took her to a hotel, where she says she was raped by this person,” according to a 2021 UN report.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus travelled to Congo 14 times during the outbreak, repeatedly taking credit for the response to the outbreak while publicly commending one of the alleged rapists for his heroic work.

“It is unconscionable that this should ever have happened, and the sheer scale of the sexual assaults is shocking,” said Lawrence Gostin, chair of global health law at Georgetown University.

All of this was known two years ago following an AP investigation, which revealed that senior WHO management was informed of sexual exploitation during the agency’s efforts to curb Ebola but did little to stop it. What wasn’t revealed was how the WHO put a bow on the whole thing.

According to a new report from AP, internal documents reveal that the agency paid 104 victims some $250 each, an amount that is less than a single day’s expenses for some UN officials working in the Congolese capital but which can support more than four months of survival in a country where many live on less than $2.15 per day.

What’s more, the women had to complete a training course to help them start “income-generating activities” before they received the cash due to a UN policy that doesn’t pay reparations.

Many Congolese women who were sexually abused have still received nothing. WHO said in a confidential document last month that about a third of the known victims were “impossible to locate.” The WHO said nearly a dozen women declined its offer.

The total of $26,000 that WHO has provided to the victims equals about 1% of the $2 million WHO-created “survivor assistance fund” for victims of sexual misconduct, primarily in Congo. -AP

The recipients told AP that the money, while not enough, wouldn’t give them the satisfaction of justice.

“It’s not unheard of for the U.N. to give people seed money so they can boost their livelihoods, but to mesh that with compensation for a sexual assault, or a crime that results in the birth of a baby, is unthinkable,” said Paula Donovan, who co-directs the Code Blue campaign to eliminate what it calls impunity for sexual misconduct in the U.N., and described the payoffs as “perverse,” and decried the training requirement before receiving the cash.

Two women who met with Dr. Gaya Gamhewage, the doctor who leads the WHO’s efforts to prevent sexual abuse, told her that what they wanted most was for the “perpetrators to be brought to account so they could not harm anyone else,” according to the WHO documents.

“There is nothing we can do to make up for sexual abuse and exploitation,” Gamhewage told AP.

The documents show that staff costs account for more than half of the $1.5 million the WHO set aside towards the prevention of sexual misconduct in Congo for 2022-2023, or $821,856. Another 12% was allocated for prevention activities, and 35%, or $535,000, was for “victim support,” which includes legal assistance, transportation, and psychological support.

According to the WHO, the criteria to determine its “victim survivor package” included the cost of food in Congo and “global guidance on not dispensing more cash than what would be reasonable for the community in order to not expose recipients to further harm.”

Click here to read more.

Comments

Source
Zero Hedge

Related Articles

Back to top button