Berlin Museum Pokes Fun At German Bureaucracy
Germany is notorious for its bureaucracy. One of the center-left government’s central pledges was to slash through the thicket of laws and rules. But many feel that the new legislation due to be agreed by parliament at the end of June falls far short of what is necessary.
Now, the Initiative for a New Social Market Economy (INSM), a market-liberal lobbying organization, has created a pop-up museum designed to turn up the heat on the German government — complete with a marketeer’s take on an S&M bondage-style darkroom.
“There is bureaucracy in all countries, but this has become the No. 1 disadvantage for Germany as a business location — ahead of taxes and energy prices,” said Thorsten Alsleben, managing director of the INSM, which is financed by the employers’ associations of the metal, electrical and automotive industries. He said that was reason enough for 58% of companies to decide against investing in Germany. Alsleben accuses German politics and bureaucracy of killing innovation and entrepreneurial spirit.
A waiting game
German bureaucracy is time-consuming — for companies and for individuals. Many services, such as applying for a driver’s license or an identity card, involve in-person appointments, and just getting a slot can be difficult.
According to the Bureaucracy Museum, visits such as these take two hours and 21 minutes on average. And overall, small and medium-sized businesses devote on average 13 hours a week to their paperwork.
The word paperwork is well-chosen here. Museum visitors enter through a display resembling a hollowed-out tree — to symbolize the 52 trees felled each day for the paper to feed the central government’s administrative machine.
Delays and dizzying digital diversity
Germany is a laggard in terms of digitalization compared to other European nations — and e-government is one of its worst-performing areas. The continued prevalence of fax machines in government offices has become a symbol of this failure.
In response to an EU ruling, a law was introduced in 2017 obliging authorities to make some 580 services digitally accessible by the end of 2022. But only 81 were fully up and running at the start of 2024, with 96 partially up. Why so little, so late?
Blaming federalism is too easy, Corinna Funke, from the agency GFA Public, told DW. Canada and other federal nations are outperforming Germany in the digital competitiveness rankings.
Germany’s approach, she said, remains too decentralized, spawning a dizzying variety of software and hardware for similar services in different places and rival platforms.
“In the digital space, quality depends heavily on having a single platform everyone knows, with the same templates, design, one-stop shops and common standards,” Funke said.
Funke also blames the slow pace of digitalization on a lack of public service culture. She said this had historical roots. While the rule of law and efficient administration processes were established here under Prussian rule, in anglophone countries, the Nordic states and the Netherlands, democracy came first.
“This is where these different self images come from — of public servants on the one hand and bureaucrats, or state servants, on the other,” Funke said. “The most important values and norms in the administrations of bureaucratic countries are not so much efficiency or being citizen-friendly or saving taxpayers money. It is very often about implementing the law.”
Number of laws out of control
Sometimes there are bewildering contradictions, Alsleben said. “The work health and safety office might tell a bakery that they need to install tiles with non-slip ridges, then the health office says that smooth ones are needed for the sake of hygiene,” he added.
The number of laws and regulations has spiraled out of hand, Alsleben said. At the Bureaucracy Museum visitors can pick out their least favorite ones and get them put through the paper shredder.
Alsleben said risk aversion and distrust of businesspeople were to blame. “That leads to the attempt to try to cover every single possible case in regulation.” Alsleben believes there are too many lawyers and legal experts in parliament and the administrative apparatus and not enough people with business experience.
The INSM is calling for workshops in which policymakers and small and medium-sized enterprises test the practicability of planned legislation.
Lobby groups and creative bureaucrats
Ines Mergel, professor of public administration at the University of Konstanz, said the private sector was partly responsible for so many laws itself.
“Lots of lobbying goes into policymaking,” Mergel said. “Often, civil servants and policymakers have created a rather broad policy and then every time something goes wrong we also need an addition to that policy — to also capture all the exceptions. Lots of laws have evolved over time, and it was never the intent to regulate as much as possible, but it is a societal process that happens between all these different actors.”
