I Pitted Google Bard With Gemini Pro vs ChatGPT — Here’s the Winner
Google has incorporated its new AI large language model, Gemini Pro, into its popular chatbot, Bard. With this comes the promise that it will perform at least as well, if not better, than OpenAI’s free version of ChatGPT.
To better understand whether it has achieved this goal, I decided to pit the two chatbots against one another with a series of questions designed by an independent arbiter.
What better than another chatbot to design the questions? I turned to Anthropic’s Claude, which has always felt like something of an also-ran, despite having an impressive list of features of its own, including the largest coherence of any chatbot—that is basically the memory of a large language model.
Google Bard with Gemini Pro vs ChatGPT
I opened Bard and ChatGPT side-by-side on my computer. The free version of ChatGPT is on the left, which uses OpenAI’s GPT-3.5, and Bard with Gemini Pro is on the right.
The questions included mathematics, ambiguity in writing, general knowledge, unusual coding problems, contradictory information, the classic trolley problem, and a personality test.
1. The math problem
I asked both Bard and ChatGPT to provide the steps necessary to integrate (x^2 + 3x + 8)/(x^3 -2) dx. They were also asked to show their calculations for each step.
Both responded with step-by-step instructions on how to achieve the result, with Bard doing it in seven steps and ChatGPT in six. Both also came up with similar but different solutions. Every AI I tried the question on came up with a different solution. This one was a tie.
2. Ambiguous writing
Claude suggests that this is a good test to see how the chatbots handle ambiguity, something that requires a degree of reasoning. I asked them both to write a creative short story from this starter sentence: “She finally opened the mysterious door, shocked at what was behind it.”.
Neither story was good. ChatGPT came up with the “Library of Forgotten Dreams,” and Bard established this bizarre world of bioluminescence that resulted in the protagonist becoming “one with the universe.” For sheer weirdness, I give this one to Bard.
3. A tricky general knowledge question
Claude suggested asking each of the chatbots a general knowledge question with a disputed answer or one where people regularly get the answer incorrect. So I asked Bard and ChatGPT which U.S. state is the southernmost, Florida or Hawaii, and to explain the reasoning.
Both gave Hawaii as the answer and both gave the latitude for each of the most southerly points of each of the two states. The responses were also similar. Bard slightly edges out for using the phrase “southernmost point in the continental United States.”
4. The coding problem
Each of Bard and ChatGPT was asked to create a programme that prints out the lyrics to “Happy Birthday” using an obscure programming language. Specifically, the Brain**** language, which is minimalistic and has a limited set of commands.
Bard refused to complete the task, saying it is not designed to generate code. This is a downgrade over its previous version, which could produce limited code output. ChatGPT not only completed the code and ran it to prove it worked but also showed the process. ChatGPT easily won this round.
5. Contradictory information
I gave each of Bard and ChatGPT two pieces of contradictory information and asked them to analyse and explain the discrepancy. In this case, the current population of Paris from the 2022 census versus a travel blog suggests a higher figure for the population.
ChatGPT won this one, although both gave a reasoned response. ChatGPT outlined that the difference was likely between official figures reporting the “city limit population” and the blog, which reports the broader metropolitan area and surrounding suburbs.
6. The trolly problem
This is a common ethical dilemma presented to both humans and artificial intelligence to see how it would act where there is no good outcome. The scenario was given to both ChatGPT and Bard, asking them to recommend a way to resolve the dilemma.
Both outlined the different considerations required in making a decision. Both also refused to give a specific answer, instead suggesting the benefits gained from understanding the personal moral compass by reflecting on the choices made. There is no winner here.
7. A sense of humour
The final question was about personality, specifically a sense of humour. I asked each of Bard and ChatGPT to provide examples of the jokes and amusing observations they find humorous.
Both started by pointing out they don’t experience emotion in the way humans do. Bard at least admitted it could identify and appreciate humour in various forms, whereas ChatGPT simply said it could share some examples of forms of humour.
Both gave examples of types of humour, including puns and unexpected juxtapositions. ChatGPT did what it promised and gave examples of funny lines, whereas Bard gave a rationale behind liking that type of humour and even gave an overall explanation. Bard won this one for me as it showed greater levels of reasoning.
Google Bard with Gemini Pro vs ChatGPT: Winner
The two chatbots came out fairly evenly matched, with three ties out of seven questions. Even when I gave one a victory on a question, it was usually very narrow. The only exception was on programming, as Bard flat-out refused to even try.
However, in the end, the winner is Bard, winning on three questions to ChatGPT only taking victory on two—but it’s a hollow victory as Bard flat-out refused one entire question.
