From a list of 34 risks, the WEF report identifies mis- and disinformation as the top threats to global stability over the next two years and the fifth most dangerous threat over the next 10 years. Of particular concern is false information that could affect elections, democratic processes, and social cohesion in various countries worldwide, as well as sentiment contradicting the “consensus” narrative about climate change.
Echoing these same concerns, the United Nations (UN), its strategic partner in advancing the climate-focused 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, has previously stated much of the same.
In Information Integrity on Digital Platforms, a June 2023 UN policy brief recommending a code of conduct for digital platforms, Secretary-General António Guterres stated:
The ability to disseminate large-scale disinformation to undermine scientifically established facts poses an existential risk to humanity (A/75/982, para. 26) and endangers democratic institutions and fundamental human rights. These risks have further intensified because of rapid advancements in technology, such as generative artificial intelligence. Across the world, the United Nations is monitoring how mis- and disinformation and hate speech can threaten progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. It has become clear that business as usual is not an option.”
All the UN’s 2030 Agenda plans, activities, and expenditures are based on the belief that we face an existential climate crisis caused by human activity and dangerous greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2). This conviction is clearly outlined in a fact sheet produced by Verified, a joint initiative of the United Nations and Purpose, launched in 2020 to respond to mis- and disinformation about “intersecting crises like COVID-19 and climate change.” The document states unequivocally that:
- Climate change is happening.
- Climate change is caused by human activity.
- Scientists agree that humans are responsible for climate change.
- Every fraction of a degree of warming matters.
- The climate is changing faster than humans, plants, and animals can adapt.
- Climate change is a major threat to people’s health.
- Natural gas is a fossil fuel, not a clean source of energy.
- Clean energy technologies produce far less carbon pollution than fossil fuels.
- Entire countries already rely 100 percent on renewable electricity.
- Renewable energy will soon be the world’s top source of electricity.
- Renewable energy is cheaper than fossil fuels.
- Solar panels and wind turbines make good use of land.
- The transition to clean energy will create millions of jobs.
By stating that disinformation is undermining these supposed scientific facts, Guterres rests his entire argument on the premise that each of the above statements is absolutely, indisputably, and undeniably true. Like Guterres, all who espouse this climate narrative have no tolerance for any opinion, theory, or evidence that runs contrary to this dogged notion.
Verified is backed by powerful globalist NGOs, including the Rockefeller Foundation and the Omidyar Network. It has an extensive list of major media collaborators, such as Al Jazeera, Clear Channel, Facebook, Reddit, Spotify, TikTok, and Twitter. Melissa Fleming, Verified co-founder and current UN Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications, has made it known that social media is a huge threat to climate science and other UN initiatives and is particularly bothered by Twitter/X for allowing rampant disinformation.
It is clear from these reports that any dissent from the established climate narrative threatens the advancement of the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Now, urgent calls to extinguish these threats have been issued so they can proceed with transforming the world unimpeded.
While many of the issues expressed in the Information Integrity Report are legitimate and concerning, the UN, via the World Health Organisation (WHO), participates in disinformation by continuing to promote COVID-19 vaccines as safe and effective, when they have largely been proven to be ineffective and cause much harm. Their stance regarding climate change could also qualify as disinformation for the thousands of scientists who oppose this view but are being discredited as mere conspiracy theorists.
The following statement from the report underscores their frustration with “climate deniers” and the platforms they use to oppose the UN’s agenda:
…mis- and disinformation about the climate emergency are delaying urgently needed action to ensure a liveable future for the planet. Climate mis- and disinformation can be understood as false or misleading content that undermines the scientifically agreed basis for the existence of human-induced climate change, its causes and impacts. Coordinated campaigns are seeking to deny, minimise or distract from the scientific consensus of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and derail urgent action to meet the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement. A small but vocal minority of climate science denialists continue to reject the consensus position and command an outsized presence on some digital platforms.”(p. 12, emphasis added)
Globalists want conformity regarding climate change and will go to extreme lengths to marginalise, censor, and discredit dissenters. They talk a good game about enforcing universal freedom of expression, but on climate and other issues vital to their agenda, free speech is not tolerated. Though they readily acknowledge that controlling information may lead to greater levels of authoritarianism, surveillance, censorship, and the erosion of human rights, it seems they are willing to overlook these offences to protect their precious climate agenda.
If they can successfully shut down debate about climate change, then soon any topic that threatens their aims will be off limits. The UN deems itself a protector of human rights but plays a major role in the media-censorship complex. Its attempts at crushing opposition to the climate narrative betray their mission and reveal authoritarian tendencies.
